Bill
2024
2023C
2023
2023B
2022A
2022O
2022D
2022C
2022
2021B
2021A
2021
2020O
2020
2019
2018O
2018
2017A
2017
2016O
2016
2015C
2015B
2015A
2015
2014O
2014A
2014
2013
2012O
2012B
2012
2011
2010A
2010O
2010C
2010
2009B
2009
2009A
2008O
2008
2007D
2007C
2007B
2007
2007A
2006O
2006
2005B
2005
2004A
2004O
2004
2003E
2003D
2003C
2003B
2003A
2003
2002O
2002E
2002D
2002
2001C
2001B
2001
2001A
2000
2000A
1999
1998
Search
Statute
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Search
Site
Search
FLORIDA HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES
Site Search
Search
Find Bill
2024
2023C
2023
2023B
2022A
2022O
2022D
2022C
2022
2021B
2021A
2021
2020O
2020
2019
2018O
2018
2017A
2017
2016O
2016
2015C
2015B
2015A
2015
2014O
2014A
2014
2013
2012O
2012B
2012
2011
2010A
2010O
2010C
2010
2009B
2009
2009A
2008O
2008
2007D
2007C
2007B
2007
2007A
2006O
2006
2005B
2005
2004A
2004O
2004
2003E
2003D
2003C
2003B
2003A
2003
2002O
2002E
2002D
2002
2001C
2001B
2001
2001A
2000
2000A
1999
1998
Search
Find Statute
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Search
Home
Bills
Representatives
Committees
Leadership
House Schedule
Publications
Tracking
Home
Bills
Floor Vote
Floor Vote for
Bill Number:
0187
Date:
Thursday, February 29, 2024
Reading #:
0
Barcode #:
NA
Sequence:
740
In the Chair:
Renner
Floor Actions:
Passage
Y
Abbott
Y
Altman
Y
Alvarez
Y
Amesty
-
Anderson
Y
Andrade
Y
Antone
Y
Arrington
Y
Baker
Y
Bankson
Y
Barnaby
Y
Bartleman
Y
Basabe
Y
Bell
Y
Beltran
Y
Benjamin
Y
Berfield
Y
Black
Y
Borrero
Y
Botana
Y
Brackett
Y
Bracy Davis
Y
Brannan
Y
Buchanan
Y
Busatta Cabrera
Y
Campbell
Y
Canady
Y
Caruso
-
Casello
Y
Cassel
-
Chamberlin
-
Chambliss
Y
Chaney
Y
Clemons
Y
Cross
Y
Daley
Y
Daniels
Y
Driskell
Y
Duggan
Y
Dunkley
Y
Edmonds
Y
Eskamani
Y
Esposito
Y
Fabricio
Y
Fine
Y
Franklin
Y
Gantt
Y
Garcia
Y
Garrison
Y
Giallombardo
Y
Gonzalez Pittman
Y
Gossett-Seidman
Y
Gottlieb
Y
Grant
Y
Gregory
Y
Griffitts
Y
Harris
Y
Hart
Y
Hinson
Y
Holcomb
Y
Hunschofsky
Y
Jacques
Y
Joseph
Y
Keen
Y
Killebrew
Y
Koster
Y
LaMarca
Y
Leek
Y
López, J.
Y
Lopez, V.
Y
Maggard
Y
Maney
Y
Massullo
Y
McClain
Y
McClure
Y
McFarland
Y
Melo
Y
Michael
Y
Mooney
Y
Nixon
Y
Overdorf
Y
Payne
Y
Perez
Y
Persons-Mulicka
Y
Plakon
Y
Plasencia
Y
Porras
Y
Rayner
Y
Redondo
Y
Renner
Y
Rizo
Y
Roach
Y
Robinson, F.
Y
Robinson, W.
Y
Rommel
Y
Roth
Y
Rudman
Y
Salzman
-
Shoaf
Y
Silvers
Y
Sirois
Y
Skidmore
Y
Smith
Y
Snyder
Y
Stark
Y
Steele
Y
Stevenson
Y
Tant
Y
Temple
Y
Tomkow
Y
Trabulsy
Y
Tramont
Y
Truenow
Y
Tuck
Y
Valdés
Y
Waldron
Y
Williams
Y
Woodson
Y
Yarkosky
Y
Yeager
Total Yeas:
115
Total Nays:
0
Total Abstained:
0
Total Missed:
5
Total Votes:
115
Vote After Roll Call:
Yeas
Anderson
02/29/2024 02:24:03 PM
Casello
03/09/2024 12:16:53 PM
Chamberlin
03/20/2024 03:21:18 PM
Explanations of Vote:
Eskamani -
I want to thank both sponsors for working with myself and community stakeholders in adopting an amendment to this bill that clarifies two essential points: 1. Criticism of the State of Israel similar to that expressed towards any other country is not antisemitic; and 2. No part of this bill will infringe on First Amendment rights. I am hopeful that this bill will assist in tracking instances of antisemitism but encourage the legislature to review and implement parts of the U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism if we hope to combat antisemitism long-term, alongside other forms of bigotry and hate.
Joseph -
As an attorney specializing in civil rights, I have and continue to combat discrimination. With a background in international human rights, I also stand against violence against both Jews and Palestinians—especially noncombatant civilians, over 30,000 of whom have been killed to date in what the International Court of Justice has determined may plausibly be “genocide" by Israel. While the actual IHRA definition in Section 1(s) is laudable, I disfavor the nonbinding “contemporary examples” enumerated in subsections (g), (j), and (h) because, inter alia, the definition's drafters have repeatedly explained they were never intended for codification, and the European inaction that birthed the definition are inapposite to the U.S. which has and enforces laws prohibiting race and religious-based discrimination. The IHRA definition has sometimes been weaponized against those peacefully protesting. To mitigate against this potential abuse, I participated in negotiations for amendments to include language from HB 741 to ensure that criticism of Israel does not constitute antisemitism; and that this new law should not be construed to impair First Amendment protections under the U.S. Constitution, or conflict with antidiscrimination protections (e.g. against Islamophobia or anti-Arab/Palestinian discrimination).
Subscribe:
Modal title
×